|
Because Afghanistan's Buddhist population no longer existed, which
removed the possibility of the statues being worshipped, he added:
"The government considers the Bamiyan statues as an example
of a potential major source of income for Afghanistan from international
visitors. The Taliban states that Bamiyan shall not be destroyed
but protected."
Afghan's Islamist clerics would begin a campaign to crack down
on "un-Islamic" segments of Afghan society. The Taliban
soon banned all forms of imagery, music and sports, including television.
There is reason to believe that this was in accordance with a strict
interpretation of Islamic law.
In March 2001, according to Agence France Presse in Kabul, the
decree declared, "Based on the verdict of the clergymen and
the decision of the Supreme Court of the Islamic Emirate (Taliban)
all the statues around Afghanistan must be destroyed. All the statues
in the country should be destroyed because these statues have been
used as idols and deities by the non-believers before. They are
respected now and may be turned into idols in future too. Only Allah,
the Almighty, deserves to be worshipped, not anyone or anything
else."
Information and Culture Minister Qadratullah Jamal told Associated
Press of a decision by 400 religious clerics from across Afghanistan
declaring the Buddhist statues against the tenets of Islam. "They
came out with a consensus that the statues were un-Islamic,"
said Jamal.
On March 6, the London Times quoted Mullah Mohammed Omar as stating,
"Muslims should be proud of smashing idols. It has given praise
to God that we have destroyed them." He had clearly changed
his position from being in favor of the statues to being against
them. During a March 13 interview for Japan's Mainichi Shimbun,
Foreign Afghan Minister Wakil Ahmad Mutawakel stated that the destruction
was anything but a retaliation against the international community
for economic sanctions: "We are destroying the Buddha statues
in accordance with Islamic law and it is purely a religious issue".
On March 18, The New York Times reports, that a Taliban envoy said
the Islamic government made its decision in a rage after a foreign
delegation offered money to preserve the ancient works while a million
Afghans faced starvation. The New York Times also added, however,
that other reports "have said the religious leaders were debating
the move for months, and ultimately decided that the statues were
idolatrous and should be obliterated."
|